Gregg Mchatton no up in the Backswing - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Gregg Mchatton no up in the Backswing

Emergency Room - Swingers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2010, 09:01 AM
Daryl's Avatar
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by O.B.Left View Post
I'd like the court to recognize that the honourable D, has added some wordage that doesnt exist within my 6th edition of the book.

Please, strike from the record everything after "Backstroke"...... commencing with "ensure that the ..." This is a horrible mis representation of Homers actual text . I can only assume for his own benefit, to make a point. Shame. The court can only wonder where else this sort of thing has happened in the past!

I suggest a total audit of all Daryls previous posts and I elect Mike O. and Bucket as co auditors.

Let it be so.


D, how can the right arm push on the way back when its on the front of the club? Seems like a pull to me.
You're watchful and tough, however I wasn't "Quoting". I was "explaining".

"D, how can the right arm push on the way back when its on the front of the club? Seems like a pull to me."

When I try to Straighten my Right Arm with Triceps muscle, I call it "Push".
__________________
Daryl
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2010, 10:03 AM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
The "L" Word
Originally Posted by Daryl View Post

You're watchful and tough, however I wasn't "Quoting". I was "explaining".

"D, how can the right arm push on the way back when its on the front of the club? Seems like a pull to me."

When I try to Straighten my Right Arm with Triceps muscle, I call it "Push".
I'll add a third perspective: Lift . . .

As Daryl has stated, when the right triceps is active, it pushes and gives width to the Stroke. As O.B. has stated, this Extensor Action pulls on the left arm, stretching it and likewise providing structure to the Stroke.

But, this pushing/pulling Action (Non-Accelerating Thrust / 6-C-0 #2) does not move the Left Arm. For that to happen, the right arm and its right elbow action (bending and straightening) must lift (and lower) the left (7-3). This is an On Plane Action, of course, but it is nevertheless a lift.

Otherwise, even when structured, the left arm and club (Primary Lever Assembly) will be simply drug around the body (the "disruptive Shoulder Turn Takeaway" / 10-6-B). Thus, it will be hopelessly Under Plane and therefore misaligned in relation to the Baseline of the Plane and the ball that rests upon it.

This mistake can be, indeed must be, corrected by realigning at the Top, as happens in the Compensated Strokes of even fine players. But, why bother with all that when a simple solution is available? Namely, use an On Plane (Zone 3), Right Forearm Pickup (Zone 2) in conjunction with a perfect Pivot (Zone 1).

__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2010, 10:44 AM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
Please extend comment to include;

7-10- ... correct Rhythm in both directions. ....

Thanks

The Bear
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2010, 10:44 AM
david sandridge david sandridge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 163
My efforts at keeping the left wrist flat and extensor action combined with my intensity always made it difficult to swing without excessive tension. That as a result kept me from experiencing "throw out". I ended up with a corrupted CF swinging procedure with hitting and steering elements. Therefore I had trouble releasing and getting to a full finish. Greg believes the arms just hang and if he lifts your arms up at address and it pulls your thorax and head up he feels you have to much tension. I think that is a good concept. However extensor action is mentioned so often it is essential to a good procedure. For me I have to guard against to much EA and rigidity. Also I feel that although other thoughts and ideas can be helpful it is important to commit to one set of ideas for success. I am guilty of tinkering with my swing to much. So for me I am committed to the "literalists" because I feel that will work best for me. So I am trying to eliminate everything I can. There is a time to get off the forum's, stop looking at the videos, give up on the golf publications close your mind. For this to work you have to have chosen the right procedures. I think I am on the right track
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2010, 11:57 AM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Freedom Within Structure
Originally Posted by david sandridge View Post
My efforts at keeping the left wrist flat and extensor action combined with my intensity always made it difficult to swing without excessive tension. That as a result kept me from experiencing "throw out". I ended up with a corrupted CF swinging procedure with hitting and steering elements. Therefore I had trouble releasing and getting to a full finish. Greg believes the arms just hang and if he lifts your arms up at address and it pulls your thorax and head up he feels you have to much tension. I think that is a good concept. However extensor action is mentioned so often it is essential to a good procedure. For me I have to guard against to much EA and rigidity.
It is true that Extensor Action can be exaggerated into an immobilizing fault. However, that does not obviate its purpose; namely, to provide a "structural rigidity" that is a strong deterrent to collapse under the stresses created by a powerful golf stroke, especially at the Top and through Impact.

To achieve maximum Zone 2 Power, the Arms (and with them the Club) must swing freely from the Shoulders (and not be bound to and drug around by them). Also, the Wrists must remain flexible to perform their Release functions (Uncock and Roll). However, that does not mean that the Power Package Structure (which these Components and their Loading collectively comprise) should be "loose" or, worse yet, "flimsy". Or that the Hands should be robbed of the firm Grip necessary to control Clubface alignments.

Just as there are good and bad cholesterols, so are there good and bad tensions in the Golf Stroke. Differentiating the two distills the champion.

__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2010, 01:02 PM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
Originally Posted by Yoda View Post
It is true that Extensor Action can be exaggerated into an immobilizing fault. However, that does not obviate its necessary purpose; namely, to provide a "structural rigidity" that is a strong deterrent to collapse under the stresses created by a powerful golf stroke, especially at the Top and through Impact.

To achieve maximum Zone 2 Power, the Arms (and with them the Club) must swing freely from the Shoulders (and not be bound to and drug around by them). Also, the Wrists must remain flexible to perform their Release functions (Uncock and Roll). However, that does not mean that the Power Package Structure (which these Components and their Loading collectively comprise) should be "loose" or, worse yet, "flimsy". Or that the Hands should be robbed of the firm Grip necessary to control Clubface alignments.

Just as there are good and bad cholesterols, so are there good and bad tensions in the Golf Stroke. Differentiating the two distills the champion.

It has never been made clear to me which tricept muscle('s) are active for EA.

Just as bicept curles can be performed pronate or supinate so and use DIFFERENT bicept muscle, A tricept push down can be done pronate or supinate and use DIFFERENT tricept muscle. One way creates no control but great tension the other creates "structure" and frees the wrists and power package from tension. Which does what and how is EA properly applied. This requires more description than "stretching" . HOW not WHAT.? I believe this is KEY.

The Bear again.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-27-2010, 07:19 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Some Things I Leave to God
Originally Posted by HungryBear View Post

It has never been made clear to me which tricept muscle('s) are active for EA.

Just as bicept curles can be performed pronate or supinate so and use DIFFERENT bicept muscle, A tricept push down can be done pronate or supinate and use DIFFERENT tricept muscle. One way creates no control but great tension the other creates "structure" and frees the wrists and power package from tension. Which does what and how is EA properly applied. This requires more description than "stretching" . HOW not WHAT.? I believe this is KEY.
Uh . . .

How about . . .

Stretch the left arm in the direction it is pointing?

That's what should be done, and it is what I do.

Is there a specific right triceps muscle that does this? If so, please spare me . . .

I don't want to know!

__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-27-2010, 09:45 PM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
Originally Posted by Yoda View Post
Uh . . .

How about . . .

Stretch the left arm in the direction it is pointing?

That's what should be done, and it is what I do.

Is there a specific right triceps muscle that does this? If so, please spare me . . .

I don't want to know!

I just saw this answer.

Pardon me, I did not think there were any stupid questions. I was wrong. I will print this answer and paste it into the front cover of my book. This was an honest question. I will not say more.

hb
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-27-2010, 07:33 PM
innercityteacher's Avatar
innercityteacher innercityteacher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,900
Lynn, how, if at all, does the amount of EA vary with club?
Originally Posted by Yoda View Post
It is true that Extensor Action can be exaggerated into an immobilizing fault. However, that does not obviate its purpose; namely, to provide a "structural rigidity" that is a strong deterrent to collapse under the stresses created by a powerful golf stroke, especially at the Top and through Impact.

To achieve maximum Zone 2 Power, the Arms (and with them the Club) must swing freely from the Shoulders (and not be bound to and drug around by them). Also, the Wrists must remain flexible to perform their Release functions (Uncock and Roll). However, that does not mean that the Power Package Structure (which these Components and their Loading collectively comprise) should be "loose" or, worse yet, "flimsy". Or that the Hands should be robbed of the firm Grip necessary to control Clubface alignments.

Just as there are good and bad cholesterols, so are there good and bad tensions in the Golf Stroke. Learning to differentiate between the two is one hallmark of a champion.

I would guess longer clubs need more EA, which could mean I am completely wrong.

Hey Bear. If we could take your mind for detail and share it with my "big-picture" perspectives, we could be insightful and entertaining most of the time.

ICT
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-27-2010, 09:23 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Loves You
Originally Posted by innercityteacher View Post

I would guess longer clubs need more EA, which could mean I am completely wrong.
The Power Package (with its Extensor Action) is indifferent to the Club inserted into its Clamps.

__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.