6-b-3-0 - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

6-b-3-0

7th Edition Changes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2008, 11:45 PM
phillygolf phillygolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 355
Funny guys. (just kidding, it wasnt funny though I do like the comraderie)

Bigger issue here.

I know of, I believe, 3-4 people that were 'working' on 7th edition revisions.

So........

Who's right? Who's wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2008, 12:07 AM
12 piece bucket's Avatar
12 piece bucket 12 piece bucket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
Sweet . . . I think you could get pressure points 1 2 & 3 on Mike's forehead . . . It's flatter than a pizza box.
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand

Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2008, 12:11 AM
Mike O's Avatar
Mike O Mike O is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
?
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket View Post
Sweet . . . I think you could get pressure points 1 2 & 3 on Mike's forehead . . . It's flatter than a pizza box.
That's the best you got? Oh this is going to be too easy. I'll bury you!!
__________________
Life Goal- Developing a new theory of movement based on Brain Science
Interests - Dabbling with insanity
Hobbies- Creating Quality
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2008, 02:10 AM
Daryl's Avatar
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by phillygolf View Post
Funny guys. (just kidding, it wasnt funny though I do like the comraderie)

Bigger issue here.

I know of, I believe, 3-4 people that were 'working' on 7th edition revisions.

So........

Who's right? Who's wrong?
I’ll be blunt.

I have read HK for twenty-five years and have become familiar with his words and thoughts. I know his sarcasm when he doesn’t care about something and I know how he writes when he finds something amusing. You can read TGM twenty-five times without complete understanding but you can’t read HK twenty-five times without knowing something of his personality and immense effort and dedication. I know that he painfully chose his words.

TGM was revised six times by Homer Kelley within Eleven years, and by today; he may have updated and managed more than twenty revisions. No one can say, however textbooks are commonly updated and Homer did not fear changing his perspective or correcting himself and I think he rather enjoyed them.

TGM was the brainchild that he conceived, nurtured, clarified and purified. I have most of the original six editions and a side by side comparison clearly illustrates that Homer was developing and refining his concepts. Most of them are firmly implanted but some, to a lesser degree and remain in need of development.

I think that the “notes” should have been published. I think that the few corrections (references) needed to be made to the sixth edition, could have been made and re-published as the 7th with an appendix of Homers “notes” added for those of us who wish to peek into his concerns in hopes that some insight could lead us to future development.

I think a book explaining and clarifying key concepts should have been developed for the general golfing public and teaching professionals not familiar with the original work. Small doses, color photos, you know the drill. The word “Lever” and “Lag” are being used more often. It’s interesting to me how many TGM terms are being adopted. Yet does anyone beyond us understand their origin, meaning or purpose?

No matter how often or how many people exclaim the accuracy of the translations, I cannot agree with this decision. I don’t think that the 7th edition should have been published this way. There is too much “finality”.

Did Homer Kelley or his brainchild benefit through this effort? How much fog was lifted? For you? Why? Why? Why? Together, with the “LBG Platform”, a website provided by a gracious and acutely knowledgeable host, who, without question, is the World’s foremost expert on TGM, have an enormous opportunity to expand and build TGM knowledge with each other’s guidance. Simply expanding applications, such as Putting, Chipping, it’s endless. It’s the only book of its kind and yet every sport that uses a stick to hit something to make it move uses the same Laws and Principles. Interesting. Homer learned from them too and they can learn from Homer.

So much to do and so little time. This website could be here one-hundred years from now. Imagine fifty years from now, someone visits the site and reads the Collected Works of “Bucket”. Go ahead, laugh, they will. Does the 7th Edition mark the completion of the effort? No. Get down to the “Lab” and help me figure out my Extensor experiment! Homer would.
__________________
Daryl
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2008, 04:03 AM
phillygolf phillygolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 355
Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.

I have read HK for twenty-five years and have become familiar with his words and thoughts. I know his sarcasm when he doesn’t care about something and I know how he writes when he finds something amusing. You can read TGM twenty-five times without complete understanding but you can’t read HK twenty-five times without knowing something of his personality and immense effort and dedication. I know that he painfully chose his words.
Agreed to an extent - I dont think Homer was interested in sarcasm per se, in the book, though I understand your point. Bookwise, I think he was most interseted in getting his point across and, to a degree, I feel we read too much into some concepts - meaning, we (I) look delve into concepts and look for something deeper than he says...though I guess that goes along with the territory.


Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
TGM was revised six times by Homer Kelley within Eleven years, and by today; he may have updated and managed more than twenty revisions. No one can say, however textbooks are commonly updated and Homer did not fear changing his perspective or correcting himself and I think he rather enjoyed them.
Agreed. I think a misguided perception is Homer was steadfast in his concepts. There are many, many people that have contributed to TGM - the actual print. Homer was not above changing wording to get his point across. He would hold his ground, dont get me wrong, but in the end - some of the additional revisions were a direct result of his pupils feedback.


Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
TGM was the brainchild that he conceived, nurtured, clarified and purified. I have most of the original six editions and a side by side comparison clearly illustrates that Homer was developing and refining his concepts. Most of them are firmly implanted but some, to a lesser degree and remain in need of development.
Yep. Same page. I had all editions (with the help of a friend) 3rd and 1st immaculate and signed by Homer.


Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
I think that the “notes” should have been published. I think that the few corrections (references) needed to be made to the sixth edition, could have been made and re-published as the 7th with an appendix of Homers “notes” added for those of us who wish to peek into his concerns in hopes that some insight could lead us to future development.
Not sure about the 'notes' per se.



Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
I think a book explaining and clarifying key concepts should have been developed for the general golfing public and teaching professionals not familiar with the original work. Small doses, color photos, you know the drill. The word “Lever” and “Lag” are being used more often. It’s interesting to me how many TGM terms are being adopted. Yet does anyone beyond us understand their origin, meaning or purpose?
Bingo. Nail on the head. And in my opinion, this is what separates the big boys from the masses - the ability to teach and explain concepts in everyday words. I think someone (Einstein maybe) said being a genius is the ability to take a complicated concept and make it simple.



Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
No matter how often or how many people exclaim the accuracy of the translations, I cannot agree with this decision. I don’t think that the 7th edition should have been published this way. There is too much “finality”.
Agreed - but I must admit, I havent seen the published 7th. I had the revisions way before...not sure what made it and what didnt.


Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
Did Homer Kelley or his brainchild benefit through this effort? How much fog was lifted? For you? Why? Why? Why? Together, with the “LBG Platform”, a website provided by a gracious and acutely knowledgeable host, who, without question, is the World’s foremost expert on TGM, have an enormous opportunity to expand and build TGM knowledge with each other’s guidance. Simply expanding applications, such as Putting, Chipping, it’s endless. It’s the only book of its kind and yet every sport that uses a stick to hit something to make it move uses the same Laws and Principles. Interesting. Homer learned from them too and they can learn from Homer.
Agreed on the book. Great perspective. One comment - I do feel one other person is on the level of Lynn. Different approaches, communication, etc - not going to mention names, but.......


Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
So much to do and so little time. This website could be here one-hundred years from now. Imagine fifty years from now, someone visits the site and reads the Collected Works of “Bucket”. Go ahead, laugh, they will. Does the 7th Edition mark the completion of the effort? No. Get down to the “Lab” and help me figure out my Extensor experiment! Homer would.
Shakespeareian.

Nothing to add, just going to copy it back and bow out with plagiarism (please dont sue me).

Great post Daryl. Much fun.

Patrick

Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
I’ll be blunt.
So much to do and so little time. This website could be here one-hundred years from now. Imagine fifty years from now, someone visits the site and reads the Collected Works of “Bucket”. Go ahead, laugh, they will. Does the 7th Edition mark the completion of the effort? No. Get down to the “Lab” and help me figure out my Extensor experiment! Homer would.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2008, 09:33 AM
Daryl's Avatar
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,521
It's none of my business. I must learn to keep my opinions to myself. These posts should be deleted.
Philly, I had no idea you were so deep into this. You had his notes? Hmm?

Agreed on the book. Great perspective. One comment - I do feel one other person is on the level of Lynn. Different approaches, communication, etc - not going to mention names, but.......

I understand. Thank you for your comments. I can't disagree with you. But I see no wobble at LBG. This [Web site] is a monumental effort, and though I'm only a willing and fortunate participant, I'm not blind to the work ethics "sacrifice through dedication" or "hard work through effort" or "When in doubt, get back to the Basics".
__________________
Daryl

Last edited by Daryl : 02-03-2008 at 11:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2008, 02:13 AM
phillygolf phillygolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 355
No wobble

Good stuff..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2008, 02:37 AM
Bagger Lance's Avatar
Bagger Lance Bagger Lance is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,326
Originally Posted by Daryl View Post
It's none of my business. I must learn to keep my opinions to myself. These posts should be deleted.
Philly, I had no idea you were so deep into this. You had his notes? Hmm?
".
Clarify "notes".

The "notes" as I recall were not directly Homers, but Chuck Evans transcribed notes of Homers tapes. I still have a copy somewhere and I believe they are posted deep in a thread here somewhere. Maybe someone closer to Chuck can clarify the origin.

Daryl - This is Yoda's garden and posts are pruned very carefully. The obvious weeds go immediately, but others stay and in many cases bear fruit.

Then there are posts that are strictly fertilizer.
Those have to stay as well and you haven't been shoveling any yet...well maybe just throwing a little back...thats OK.
__________________
Bagger

1-H "Because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available - but separately, and probably endlessly." Homer Kelly
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2008, 02:41 AM
phillygolf phillygolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 355
Hey Bagger,

Notes from Homer with Chuck were excerpts from tapes.


patrick
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2008, 11:11 AM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
'Notes' Versus 'Revisions"
Originally Posted by phillygolf View Post

Notes from Homer with Chuck were excerpts from tapes.

And, to clarify, these 'notes' (transcribed from audio tapes) are NOT the same as the 7th edition 'revisions' (transcribed from Homer's own hand).
__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.