|
Originally Posted by Michael Finney
|
it was on brian manzella's site.....and martee, honestly,
you're debating semantics...and as usual on most of these sites - no ALL of these sites - the debate is circular and goes nowhere....
we all have read the preface to the book and have a general understanding of what mr. kelley was trying to accomplish.....now, does it really matter whether lynn, brian, or gregg mchatton are teaching the golfing machine or teaching their favorite patterns as learned from the golfing machine?
it's all semantics...it depends on each person's frame of reference and their TGM background....but in the end, is a student receiving instrution from an AI going to get better if this particular debate is settled? - i think not
i can sum up all the golfing machine forums, all the debates, all the agendas, all the motives, all the angst, all the infighting, all the backstabbing, and all the heartache by quoting TGM's foremost instrutor - Ben Doyle......
ME: "Ben, do you like so and so's (PGA TOUR PLAYER) swing?"
BEN: "Yes, of course."
ME: "Do you like this other so and so's (PGA TOUR PLAYER) swing?"
BEN: "I like them all."
|
Like I said, I don't want this to become an AI debate...I would really like to see the debate on the new terminology in the 7th edition. Especially when we have a GSED using the terminology on video.
DG